|
Post by Kris194 on Feb 20, 2022 9:56:35 GMT
FTI Applications
Think you've solved something?
Each week a new thread is created for you to post your applications about potential findings, discoveries & observations on Gonnaenodaethat's output.
Over the 7 days this thread is open fellow members can discuss the applications - at this stage any that are found to be factually incorrect will be rejected.
Applications that survive fact checking will progress forward to be further discussed & voted upon by the Apostles who make up the Circle Of Nine with the results posted at the following weeks Sunday Service with Gonnaenodaethat doing his best impression of a Roman Emperor at the Coliseum
This thread is closed each week before Sunday Service & a fresh one is then generated for the following weeks applications.
|
|
|
Post by Nikhilmao on Feb 21, 2022 14:06:29 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 21, 2022 15:11:47 GMT
Let's. We have some older applications as well submitted by xNoSuch here and Benefactor69 here that we should discuss Let's keep it the same format; discussion based on the application and evidence it self. Then we can send a PM with votes due by Saturday, February 27th.
|
|
|
Post by Benefactor69 on Feb 22, 2022 1:21:40 GMT
Should we discuss the applications here or make a separate topic for each in the CO9 board like we used to for each submission?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 22, 2022 2:23:11 GMT
Great question.
We have the honor of hosting 40 registered members here and I think it would be best to follow what Kris has outlined in the FTI instructions
Let's discuss each application (in its own topic) as a group and then any applications we deem factual will be circulated up to the CO9 board for review and final vote will be cast via PM each Saturday.
Any applications that we do not find factual as a group will be recycled & repurposed until they can be deemed factual.
|
|
|
Post by Benefactor69 on Feb 24, 2022 23:52:54 GMT
Great question. We have the honor of hosting 40 registered members here and I think it would be best to follow what Kris has outlined in the FTI instructions Let's discuss each application (in its own topic) as a group and then any applications we deem factual will be circulated up to the CO9 board for review and final vote will be cast via PM each Saturday. Any applications that we do not find factual as a group will be recycled & repurposed until they can be deemed factual. Deciding what was factual and not was basically what the CO9 did so it might be redundant to do that twice, making the CO9 process public might accomplish something similar with fewer steps though. I'm not where to put the discussion topics outside of the CO9 board if we did go that route. Next Saturday would probably be a more realistic time to sent our decisions as well since it is getting a bit late in this week and we haven't begun yet.
Also I found another application that I don't think has been discussed here:
Which I believe makes a total of 4 applications in waiting.
|
|
|
Post by Kris194 on Mar 1, 2022 22:52:16 GMT
I would like to ask, why should we discuss any applications when we still don't have results of the last one? thelastfishsupper.proboards.com/thread/315/sunday-service-15-8-21Great question. We have the honor of hosting 40 registered members here and I think it would be best to follow what Kris has outlined in the FTI instructions Let's discuss each application (in its own topic) as a group and then any applications we deem factual will be circulated up to the CO9 board for review and final vote will be cast via PM each Saturday. Any applications that we do not find factual as a group will be recycled & repurposed until they can be deemed factual. Deciding what was factual and not was basically what the CO9 did so it might be redundant to do that twice, making the CO9 process public might accomplish something similar with fewer steps though. I'm not where to put the discussion topics outside of the CO9 board if we did go that route. Next Saturday would probably be a more realistic time to sent our decisions as well since it is getting a bit late in this week and we haven't begun yet.
Also I found another application that I don't think has been discussed here: Which I believe makes a total of 4 applications in waiting.
Brother Benefactor, this application is literally at the very top in the right section.
|
|
|
Post by Benefactor69 on Mar 2, 2022 2:10:35 GMT
I would like to ask, why should we discuss any applications when we still don't have results of the last one? thelastfishsupper.proboards.com/thread/315/sunday-service-15-8-21Deciding what was factual and not was basically what the CO9 did so it might be redundant to do that twice, making the CO9 process public might accomplish something similar with fewer steps though. I'm not where to put the discussion topics outside of the CO9 board if we did go that route. Next Saturday would probably be a more realistic time to sent our decisions as well since it is getting a bit late in this week and we haven't begun yet.
Also I found another application that I don't think has been discussed here: Which I believe makes a total of 4 applications in waiting.
Brother Benefactor, this application is literally at the very top in the right section. To the first part:
The Preacher gave "like" ratings to the original comments here about discussing those applications which I took as a nod of approval to do so. As for the older applications if I remember correctly we never got results on those because not enough people gave their input on them. If those topics were revived and the remaining members provided input on them we might get the results for those. Maybe that could be done together with the newer applications?
To the last part: Whoops, I looked in that section but I must have misread the title of the application. I didn't realize that one was already discussed awhile ago.
|
|
|
Post by Kris194 on Mar 7, 2022 18:12:54 GMT
To the first part:
The Preacher gave "like" ratings to the original comments here about discussing those applications which I took as a nod of approval to do so. As for the older applications if I remember correctly we never got results on those because not enough people gave their input on them. If those topics were revived and the remaining members provided input on them we might get the results for those. Maybe that could be done together with the newer applications?
To the last part: Whoops, I looked in that section but I must have misread the title of the application. I didn't realize that one was already discussed awhile ago.
Ok then, how would you like to do it? Should we post all missing applications or maybe we go on a week by week basis?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 7, 2022 22:46:22 GMT
Want to pin this week's FTI post and then create individual posts per application like before?
|
|
|
Post by Benefactor69 on Mar 9, 2022 1:18:25 GMT
I think we may as well have a discussion topic for each application as we did before. I like the idea of staggering the applications though, if there's too many at once they might divide everyone's attention. If there was one or two at a time everyone could focus on just discussing those ones. Once those are discussed we could send the results to the Preacher and start with the next few and keep going until they've all been done.
|
|
|
Post by Kris194 on Mar 9, 2022 5:42:34 GMT
Ok, I'll post few today in the afternoon.
Locked.
|
|